Kumba

KUMBA IRON ORESUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT REPORT 2011

FEEDBACK, COMPLIANCE AND ADMINISTRATION

ASSURANCE

INDEPENDENT ASSURANCE REPORT TO THE DIRECTORS OF KUMBA IRON ORE LIMITED

INTRODUCTION

We have been engaged by the directors of Kumba Iron Ore Limited (Kumba) to conduct an assurance engagement in accordance with the International Standards for Assurance Engagements 3000 ‘Assurance Engagements other than audits or reviews of historical financial information’ [ISAE 3000], issued by the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board, on selected Identified Sustainable Development Information reported in Kumba’s Sustainable Development Report 2011 (the Report), for the purposes of expressing a statement of independent assurance for the year ended 31 December 2011.

SCOPE AND SUBJECT MATTER

The subject matter of our engagement and related levels of assurance we are required to provide is as follows:

Reasonable assurance

The following Identified Sustainable Development Information was selected for an expression of reasonable assurance:


Limited assurance

The following Identified Sustainable Development Information was selected for an expression of limited assurance:

Our responsibilities do not extend to any other information.

RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE DIRECTORS

Kumba’s directors are responsible for the preparation and presentation of the Identified Sustainable Development Information, as incorporated in the Report, in accordance with their internally defined procedures, and for maintaining adequate records and internal controls that are designed to support the reporting process.

RESPONSIBILITY OF THE INDEPENDENT ASSURANCE PROVIDER

Our responsibility is to express a conclusion to the directors on the selected Identified Sustainable Development Information contained in the Report for the year ended 31 December 2011, based on our assurance engagement.

We consent to the inclusion of this report in the Report to assist Kumba’s members in assessing whether the directors have discharged their responsibilities by commissioning an independent assurance report from an appropriately qualified organisation, in connection with the selected subject matter.

SUMMARY OF WORK PERFORMED

We conducted our engagement in accordance with the ISAE 3000, issued by the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board.

This standard requires that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the assurance engagement to obtain either reasonable or limited assurance on the selected Identified Sustainable Development Information as per our terms of engagement. Kumba’s internal corporate reporting policies and procedures and the Global Reporting Initiative’s (GRI) G3.0 guidelines were applied as criteria for evaluating the Identified Sustainable Development Information. Definitions for the Identified Sustainable Development Information applied are those determined by Kumba and provided in the glossary on (page 99) .

Our procedures included examination, on a test basis, of evidence relevant to the selected Identified Sustainable Development Information. The procedures selected depend on the assurance provider’s judgement, including the assessment of the risks of material non-compliance of the selected Identified Sustainable Development Information with the defined reporting criteria.

Our work consisted of:

a) reviewing the processes that Kumba has in place for determining material Identified Sustainable Development Information to be included in the Report;
b) obtaining an understanding of the systems used to generate, aggregate and report data at the sampled operations;
c) conducting interviews with management at the sampled operations and at head office;
d) applying the assurance criteria in evaluating the data generation and reporting processes;
e) performing a controls walk-through;
f) testing the accuracy of data reported on a sample basis for limited and reasonable assurance;
g) reviewing the consolidation of the data at head office to obtain an understanding of the consistency of the reporting processes compared with prior years and to obtain explanations for deviations in performance trends;
h) reviewing the consistency between the Identified Sustainable Development Information and related statements in Kumba’s Report; and
i) reviewing the accuracy of Kumba’s self-declaration of the GRI (G3.0) Application Level in the Report.

We believe that the evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our assurance conclusions.

The evidence-gathering procedures for limited assurance are more restricted than for reasonable assurance and therefore less assurance is obtained with limited assurance than with reasonable assurance.

We have not carried out any work on data reported for prior reporting periods, nor have we performed work in respect of future projections and targets. We have not conducted any work outside of the agreed scope and therefore restrict our opinion to the Identified Sustainable Development Information.

INHERENT LIMITATIONS

Non-financial data is subject to more inherent limitations than financial data, given both the nature and the methods used for determining, calculating, sampling or estimating such data. Qualitative interpretations of relevance, materiality and the accuracy of data are subject to individual assumptions and judgements.

Conversion factors used to derive energy used from fuel and electricity consumed are based upon information and factors derived by independent third parties. Our assurance work has not included an examination of the derivation of those factors and other third party information.

CONCLUSION

Reasonable assurance

Based on our work performed, the Identified Sustainable Development Information selected for reasonable assurance, for the year ended 31 December 2011, is free from material misstatement.

Limited assurance

Based on our work performed, nothing has come to our attention causing us to believe that the Identified Sustainable Development Information selected for limited assurance, for the year ended 31 December 2011, is materially misstated.

PricewaterhouseCoopers Inc.

Director: Wessie van der Westhuizen
Johannesburg

20 March 2012