Safety, health and environmental (SHE) performance
Our policy
Omnia is an active member of the Chemical and Allied
Industries’ Association (CAIA) and a signatory to the
association’s Responsible Care initiative. Committed to continual
improvement in all aspects of our health, safety and environmental performance, we strive to align our business with
the global Responsible Care® principles, which requires us to:
 |
Conduct our operations in a manner that minimises adverse
environmental impacts and protects the health and safety
of our employees and the public. |
 |
Manage the triple bottom line of our operations as an
integral part of our business. |
 |
Integrate health, safety and environmental considerations
into our planning for new products and processes. |
 |
Use resources efficiently and minimise waste. |
 |
Engage and work with people to understand and address
their concerns and expectations. |
 |
Co-operate with governments and organisations in the
development and implementation of effective regulations
and standards. |
 |
Provide help and advice to foster the responsible
management of chemicals by those who manage and use
them along the product chain. |
| |
BME facilitates new explosives code
for South Africa
In an effort to bring the country on par with best-practice safety
standards in the mining industry, the South African National
Standard 551 code for mining explosives has been drafted
by the South African Bureau of Standards, in collaboration
with industry role-players, including Omnia, and will be enforced
in 2010.
The new standards enable the formalisation and standardisation
of the approval tests required for the authorisation of all
explosives used in the local commercial explosives industry,
and regulate most aspects of the industry – from explosives
transportation to safe handling and security of all explosives.
Although local manufacturers and suppliers of explosives
products have always internally adopted internationally accepted
methodologies relating to product design, quality and safety,
a formal national standard only existed for permitted explosives
and permitted detonators used in coal-mining operations.
This changed in 2006, when a working committee comprising
role-players from industry approached government and
expressed the need for a national standard, which has become
necessary with the diversification of the industry. BME was one
of the companies on this committee.
A number of companies supply explosives to the mining industry
and they have often adopted international best practices
governing the industry. The new regulations incorporate
international best practices, most of which come from Europe
and Canada, but have been adjusted to suit South African
conditions.
BME cautions, though, that while the standards introduced
will regulate the industry, they are still only the minimum
standards and there is significant room for improvement on
the part of companies.
Addressing Africa’s challenges
BME also supplies a number of countries in Africa, with a
primary focus on the southern and West Africa regions,
where it has seen significant mining expansion interest,
particularly for gold in West Africa.
Growth in mining development across the continent will
positively benefit the mining supply industry. BME’s extensive
understanding of the unique aspects of doing business in
Africa is an advantage that international product suppliers are
sometimes unable to match.
However, some of the challenges in Africa that supply chain
companies need to overcome include logistics because of
varying infrastructure standards across the continent. Explosives
that are supplied to mines need to be transported on existing
transport infrastructure, such as roads, and this is a factor which
cannot be controlled by the supplier but needs to be accounted
for in planning.
In the explosives sector, an additional challenge is the lack
of comprehensive legislation governing the use of explosives
and the processes of importing them for business purposes.
BME has been involved in assisting some countries to
develop legislation in this regard, including participation in the
development of an Explosives Act in Mauritania, in West Africa. |
|
To entrench these commitments throughout the Group,
we have committed ourselves to implementing an Integrated
Management System (IMS), which is based on ISO 9001,
ISO 14 001 and OHSAS 18 001 guidelines. The roll-out of the
IMS has been completed at Omnia Fertilizer and BME, and is
anticipated to be completed at Protea Chemicals by the end
of 2011.
In addition to health and safety committees at all sites, a joint
Safety, Health, Environment and Quality (SHEQ) committee is in
place, chaired by the Group general manager for engineering
projects and services. The SHEQ committee meets on a
quarterly basis to discuss SHEQ projects and issues of mutual
interest within the Group, and to transfer knowledge and best
practice between divisions.
SHEQ aspects, impacts and risks per site are continuously
evaluated and recorded on the respective registers for all our
sites in terms of the IMS. Occupational health and safety risk
assessments are also conducted on each site once every two
years as per the requirements of the Occupational Health and
Safety (OHS) Act.
The results of these assessments are communicated to the
health and safety committees of all sites, and remedial projects
are identified, implemented and monitored. A summary of major
risks is included in the Omnia Group risk management report
which is reviewed by the Omnia Group risk committee in its
bi-annual meetings.
The Group has also decided to formulate more stringent product
requirements for its international suppliers. Checks by qualified
Omnia personnel are now standard procedure on internationally
supplied materials. These quality measures are applied
throughout the supply chain, from the supplier’s facilities to the
point of delivery.
Measuring our performance
Several initiatives to continually improve Omnia’s safety, health,
and environmental performance, and the quality of Omnia’s products and services, have been implemented during the
period under review. Opportunities for improvement still exist
following our philosophy of continued improvement and specific
projects will be launched in the next financial year to address
priority issues.
SHE expenditure
The Group’s total expenditure on safety, health and
environmental aspects for the period under review increased
from R61 million in F2009 to R77 million in F2010. Capital spend
during 2010 included R24 million for a co-generation project,
which involved the installation of a 1 920 kW turbo-generator at
the Omnia Fertilizer factory in Sasolburg, which was successfully
commissioned during the year.
Transport
Transport incidents
The number of transport-related incidents is a cause for concern.
Specific measures were implemented for the approval of
contractors used for deliveries, vehicle checklists and directives
on load securement. The total number of transport incidents
decreased from 57 in F2009 to 55 in F2010. All of these
incidents have been dealt with in a responsible way and
rehabilitation was introduced where required.
Transport incidents include all transport incidents over land, sea, air
and rail which involve raw materials, intermediates, final product,
own vehicles and contractor vehicles. They exclude claims relating
to insurance incidents on employee motor fleet vehicles.
Incidents per ton manufactured
Transport incidents per 100 000 ton of product manufactured
increased from 2,81 to 3,02 due to a decrease in the volume
of products manufactured and an increase in the amount of
products traded.
| |
BME’s new shocktube production plant provides a
safer alternative in underground mining applications
In mid 2009, BME commissioned a shocktube production plant
in Losberg in the North West province to improve its service
offering to the mining industry by providing another safer
alternative to fuse igniter cord. The production facility, a
significant investment for the company, is situated near
Carltonville – famous for housing some of the deepest mines in
the world.
BME has been researching and developing its shocktube
technology for a number of years and has been using it
extensively in surface mining applications. Now it is driving its
shocktube technology for underground applications – where its
market share has been relatively modest – as a priority.
With shocktube blasting, the tube acts as a signal transmitter
between the detonators in each blasthole. The hollow tube is lined with a fine layer of explosives powder. When lit, this
powder detonates and generates a pressure wave that travels
down the tube to the detonator in the explosives in the hole.
With conventional fuse-and-igniter-cord technology, the
disadvantages are that the blasthole firing times can be
inaccurate. Ideally, in a blast, it is best to have all holes firing
as closely as possible to their designed firing times; this is very
hard to achieve with fuse technology as fuses burn at variable
speeds. This may result in poor fragmentation, hanging-wall
damage and an uneven face advance.
BME’s technology therefore allows mines to achieve improved
overall efficiency, and save money.
In addition, more effective safety practices – such as this
technology introduces – are of vital importance in the use
of mining explosives. BME partners with its clients to assist
them in ensuring the best safety practice when dealing
with explosives. |
|
Legal incidents
The number of legal incidents, which include SHE-related fines,
warnings summonses and penalties, increased significantly
from two during F2009 to 17 in F2010. At Omnia Fertilizer, the Department of Labour investigated and completed three
lost-time injuries in a satisfactory manner. The fourth incident
at this division related to a visit from the Department of
Environmental Affairs for a compliance audit on a Record
of Decision that was issued based on an Environmental
Impact Assessment.
At Protea Chemicals Division, six effluent contravention notices
were received from the Nelson Mandela Local Municipality for
off-specification effluent. Three section S24G administrative
fines were also paid. The Ethikwini Municipality issued an
effluent contravention notice to Zetachem and KwaZulu-Natal
Quality Street, while a complaint relating to dust and effluent at
the division’s Springs site was investigated and managed.
Water consumption
The Group’s total water consumption increased from
861 219 kilo litres in F2009 to 1 192 378 kilo litres in F2010,
while our water consumption per ton of product increased from
0,357 kilo litres/ton of product during F2009 to 0,436 kilo litres/
ton in F2010. These increases were mainly due to greater water
usage at our Sasolburg site because of a decrease in cycles at
the nitric acid cooling tower and an increase in production.
However, water management changes have been implemented,
which significantly optimise our re-use of water and decrease
our municipal water use.
Energy consumption
The Group’s total energy consumption decreased from
8 690 113 giga-joules (GJ) in F2009 to 8 100 529 GJ in F2010,
while total energy consumption/ton of product manufactured
dropped from 3,6 GJ/ton to 3,0 GJ/ton over the same period.
This reduction in energy use can mainly be attributed to
optimisation efforts and the implementation of a new generator
at our fertilizer plant in Sasolburg, while our Rustenburg
fertilizer plant consumed less energy because of lower
production volumes.
Zetachem and PFP use HFO boilers, which make the
manufacturing process, at PFP in particular, energy intensive,
negatively affected Protea Chemicals’ energy use figures.
At Zetachem’s hypochlorite plant, membrane damage due to
power outages experienced in 2008 is now in evidence, and
reflected in higher than normal power consumption per
kilogram of hypochlorite.
Waste
General waste to landfill
Due to construction activities at our Sasolburg factory, where
building rubble is removed to the local municipality landfill site,
the Group’s total volume of general waste disposed of during
the period under review increased from 2 050 tons in F2009
to 4 761 tons in F2010.
Hazardous waste to landfill
The total volume of hazardous waste rose during F2010, but
disposal was to a registered waste site in accordance with legal
requirements. 828 tons was disposed of compared to 686 tons
in F2009. Waste removed to landfill sites increased due to the
cleaning of acid dams in the Fertilizer division. An improved
waste management and classification system, introduced at
Protea Chemicals’ East London and Port Elizabeth sites, also
contributed to the rise in the disposal of hazardous waste.
Recycled waste
A decrease in the volume of waste recycled – from 5 729 tons
in F2009 to 759 tons in F2010 can be attributed to increased
internal recycling and reworking of products at Omnia Fertilizer’s
Sasolburg site.
Environmental incidents
The Omnia Group experienced a slight increase in the number of
environmental incidents, from 92 in F2009 to 94 in F2010, but all
have been dealt with according to the NEMA principles. Eight of
these incidents – three occurring at our Fertilizer division, four at
Protea Chemicals and one incident at BME – can be classified as
major incidents.
Major environmental incidents are defined as:
 |
Incidents involving the release of greater than 1 ton of
chemicals/diesel fuel, oxidiser etc be it in the solid, liquid
or gaseous form. |
 |
Damage to ecosystems outside of the site/factory
(for example, fish, bird or wildlife kills, and damage to flora). |
 |
“Written” notices from government departments
demanding action. |
 |
Emergency services involving larger spills/leaks attracting
media attention and/or causing visible damage
to ecosystems (for example, bird or fish kills, and
dead vegetation). |
 |
Major deviations from effluent specifications for long
periods of time. |
At Omnia Fertilizer, all incidents related to transport, with
vehicles being involved in accidents while transporting product
to customers. Three of the incidents at Protea Chemicals related
to storm water contamination at the Cape Killarney Gardens
site and at Nkomati mine. The last incident was reported at
the Inlands Springs site where white precipitate emanated
from historical pollution due to leaking of the contaminated
storm water dam on the site. The incidents were reported to
authorities and measures have been taken to reduce the impact.
The incident at BME occurred at bulk distribution when a driver
had a heart attack while transporting product to a customer.
Environmental initiatives
Air quality
The following initiatives were implemented as part of the Omnia
Group’s commitment to continually improve the air quality
management within the Group.
Monitoring and reporting of greenhouse gas emissions (GHG)
Omnia acknowledges its responsibility to monitor and report on
the emission of greenhouse gases associated with its activities
and also to report on its strategy to continually reduce its GHG
emissions. Omnia’s approach can be summarised as follows:
 |
An external consultant was appointed during 2008 to
conduct a baseline GHG emissions inventory for the Omnia
Group, which consists of Omnia Group Services, Omnia
Fertilizer, Protea Chemicals and BME. The GHG gas
emissions were calculated for the period 1 April 2006 to
31 March 2007. This baseline inventory is intended to be
used as a reference to demonstrate future improvement in
terms of the reduction in such emissions. The methodology
applied to calculate GHG emissions involved: |
| |
– |
ISO14064 Part 1: “Specification with guidance at the
organisational level for the quantification and reporting of
greenhouse gas emissions and removals“ was used as
the basis for the calculation of GHG emissions. |
| |
– |
Guidelines provided by the Greenhouse Gas Protocol
were also considered during the calculation of the GHG
emissions. |
| |
– |
Using the ISO 14064-1 (2006) principles and
requirements, data was then collected on: |
| |
|
– |
Total purchased electricity. |
| |
|
– |
Energy consumption on manufacturing sites such as
diesel, coal and natural gas. |
| |
|
– |
Nitrous oxide emissions due to the production of nitric acid. |
| |
|
– |
Employee business travel, including flight destinations
associated with marketing and management. |
| |
|
– |
External distribution logistics. |
| |
|
– |
Use/disposal of company products and services. |
| |
|
– |
Transportation within the company supply chain. |
| |
– |
The following emissions from the sites were, in line
with the above protocol, considered for purposes of the
calculation of GHG emissions: |
| |
|
– |
Direct GHG emissions (scope 1) from the sites,
including the combustion of fuel such as coal, natural
gas, as well as on-site diesel consumption. |
| |
|
– |
Energy indirect emissions (scope 2), including
emissions associated with the production and
distribution of electricity from the national grid,
which is coal-based. |
| |
|
– |
Other indirect emissions (scope 3), including emissions
from all outsourced activities, such as employee
business travel, external distribution logistics, use and
disposal of company products and services, company
supply chain, etc. This is in compliance with the gate
to gate principle – defined as an inventory that consists
of all activities controllable between the gates of the
supplier and the gates of the consumer – and will
ensure a complete picture of the baseline GHG
footprint. (The diagram included below was obtained
from the GHG reporting protocol, and is an overview
of scopes and emissions across a value chain.) |
The contributions of each of Omnia Group’s divisions towards
total GHG emissions can be summarised as follows:
| |
|
|
Equivalent |
|
| |
Divisions |
ton CO2 |
| |
Agriculture |
640 049 |
| |
Mining |
81 320 |
| |
Chemicals |
8 523 |
| |
Group |
3 279 |
| |
Total |
733 171 |
 |
A follow-up GHG emissions survey to calculate and evaluate
progress in terms of the reduction of GHG emissions for the
financial year April 2009 to March 2010 is scheduled to be
completed by the end of July 2010. In addition, a
management practice standard, which serves as a guideline
for the monitoring and reporting of GHG, was recently developed by the CAIA as part of its Responsible Care
Initiative®. We will use this management practice standard
as a guideline to calculate and report on GHGs in future. |
 |
The Executive Board of the Clean Development Mechanism
Protocol issued some 504 795 assurances in terms of our
Certified Emission Reductions (CERs) from February 2008 to
date for the successful operation of Omnia’s EnviNox® plant,
which was implemented during February 2008. The
objective of this project is to reduce the NOx and N2O
emissions from the nitric acid plant at Omnia Fertilizer in
Sasolburg. Nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions are regulated in
terms of the Atmospheric Pollution Prevention Act (73 of
1965), but N2O emissions are not currently regulated. N2O is
classified as a GHG with a Global Warming Potential (GWP)
estimated to be 310 times greater than that of CO2. GHG
emissions, including N2O, is believed to contribute towards
global climate change. Omnia identified the reduction of
NOx and N2O emissions from its nitric acid plant as an
opportunity to contribute towards the improvement of the air
quality of the Vaal Triangle, which is a declared National
Priority Area in terms of the National Environmental
Management Air Quality Act (Act 39 of 2004). |
Air quality permits and compliance
 |
Existing Air Quality Certificates in terms of the Atmospheric
Pollution Prevention Act (45 of 1965) were reviewed and
updated, and are being converted to the new format
required in terms of the National Environmental
Management Air Quality Act. The reviewed permit
applications were submitted to the National Department of
Environmental Aff
airs for approval and issuing of new
permits in terms of the National Environmental Management
Air Quality Act. |
 |
Protea Specialities Chemicals has purchased equipment to
monitor exhaust emissions from its vehicles. The equipment
will be used to monitor the legal compliance of emissions
from all of its vehicles on a three-monthly basis. |
 |
Omnia Fertilizer has launched an Air Quality Compliance
project to confirm existing emissions and determine
mitigation measures that may be required to comply with
the new limits. |

Water, waste and effluent management
 |
At Omnia Fertilizer, a new Safety, Health and Environmental
Manager, who is also a specialist in water quality
management, has been appointed. The new manager’s
crucial tasks include reviewing and improving water quality management on all sites within Omnia Fertilizer. Projects
commissioned to improve water quality management within
Omnia Fertilizer can be summarised as follows: |
| |
– |
A project to improve water management at the Sasolburg
site has been commissioned as part of the Integrated
Water Use Licence Application (IWULA) submitted to the
Department of Water Affairs. The following important
initiatives are included in this project: |
| |
|
– |
Development of a storm water management plan
and the installation of infrastructure to separate
storm water run-off from potentially contaminated and
clean areas. The capacity of the existing storm water
effluent dams in Sasolburg was also increased at an
estimated cost of R8 million. |
| |
|
– |
An investigation into alternatives to improve the quality
of cooling water flows down from the nitric acid plant’s
existing cooling towers. |
| |
|
– |
A project to update and improve the water balance
for the Sasolburg factory. |
| |
|
– |
Upgrading the water management systems for each
of the production units at the Sasolburg factory. |
| |
|
– |
Reduction in water use through optimisation
of the use of the cooling towers on the site. |
| |
|
– |
Assessment and optimisation of the waste and effluent
management practices at the Sasolburg factory. |
| |
|
– |
An Integrated Water and Waste Management
Plan (IWWMP) has been submitted. |
| |
– |
The Integrated Water Use Licence Application and
Integrated Water and Waste Management Plan for
Rustenburg has been drafted, but needs to be revised
to include the mothballing alternative. The following
important initiatives are included in this project: |
| |
|
– |
Development of a storm water management plan
for the site and the upgrade of existing infrastructure
on the site. |
| |
|
– |
An investigation to refine and improve the water
balance for the site. |
| |
|
– |
Alternative water management practices. |
| |
|
– |
Assessing of waste and effluent management
practices on site. |
 |
Protea Chemicals’ initiatives to improve water, effluent
and waste management can be summarised as follows: |
| |
– |
A number of areas at Protea Chemicals Inland’s Wadeville
site were identified to be hard-surfaced to prevent soil
and ground water pollution. The hard surfacing of all of
these areas will require substantial capital investment
and will therefore be phased in according to priority over
the next five years. |
| |
– |
A project to improve the hard surfacing at Protea
Chemicals Inland’s site in Springs has been completed. |
| |
– |
The establishment and implementation of ground water
monitoring programmes at all Protea Chemicals facilities
are current priority areas. |
|