Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  225 / 280 Next Page
Basic version Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 225 / 280 Next Page
Page Background

BUSINESS MODEL

AND STRATEGIC

OBJECTIVES

LEADERSHIP

GOVERNANCE

OPERATING

PERFORMANCE

SHAREHOLDERS’

INFORMATION AND

ADMINISTRATION

FINANCIAL

PERFORMANCE

BLUE LABEL INTEGRATED ANNUAL REPORT 2014

223

NOTES TO THE GROUP ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

CONTINUED

For the year ended 31 May 2014

35.

LITIGATION UPDATE (continued)

Telkom sold its shareholding in MLT to Hip Oils Topco Limited on 3 October 2011. In terms of an indemnity

contained in the sale and purchase agreement, Telkom is liable for all amounts in excess of USD10 million in

respect of APSN’s claim against MLT.

Telkom and MLT instituted an action in the High Court against BLT, APS, APSN and certain individuals,

including a former senior executive of Telkom, for payment of an aggregate amount of USD724 million

(the action).

The claim in the action is based, inter alia, on an alleged breach of the duty of care and alleged

misrepresentations made by BLT, together with alleged breaches of fiduciary duties on the part of the former

senior Telkom executive, at the time the agreement was concluded, in respect of which it is alleged BLT was a

party to.

On 6 September 2013, Telkom and MLT obtained an order from the High Court which had the effect of

preventing the arbitrators from determining whether the agreement is valid and enforceable. APSN decided

not to appeal against the order and submitted itself to the jurisdiction of the High Court for the purposes of

defending the allegations made against it, BLT and the other defendants and for the purpose of proceeding

with its claim against MLT for payment of the sum of USD457 million arising out of MLT’s wrongful

repudiation of the agreement. At the same time and in the same action, APSN has advanced a claim against

Telkom for payment of the sum of USD457 million arising out of Telkom’s wrongful interference with APSN’s

contractual rights against MLT. To the extent that APSN is unable to recover its losses from MLT, APSN aims to

recover such losses from its claim against Telkom.

BLT and the other defendants vehemently deny the allegations made against them by Telkom and MLT, and

maintain that they are not liable.

A trial date has not as yet been allocated.